IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Bestwick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1982-10-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0778 0.0806 0.2917 0.3023
2002-03 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 58 16 37 53 0.914 0.3557 0.3337 1.3326 1.2500
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2006-07 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SR 11 3 6 9 0.818
2005-06 SUNY Geneseo D3 — JR 25 7 14 21 0.840
2004-05 SUNY Geneseo D3 — SO 28 11 14 25 0.893
2003-04 SUNY Geneseo D3 — FR 21 7 9 16 0.762
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.76
2003-04 · SUNY Geneseo
+282.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7210
Forward overall
#293
Forward born in 1982
#449
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Schremp
Elmira · 2003-04
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Bossert
Concordia · 2016-17
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Ouderkirk
Norwich · 2017-18
0.966 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.