IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Schremp Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-10-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Syracuse Jr. Crunch OJHL 43 14 28 42 0.977 0.2394 0.2521 0.6725 0.7081
2001-02 Syracuse Jr. Crunch OJHL 47 11 31 42 0.894 0.2190 0.2193 0.6152 0.6160
2002-03 — OJHL 34 9 17 26 0.765 0.1874 0.1799 0.5265 0.5054
2003-04 Syracuse Jr. Crunch OJHL 28 22 21 43 1.536 0.3764 0.3444 1.0573 0.9674
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 11 5 4 9 0.818
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.82
2004-05 · Elmira
+243.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12593
Forward overall
#439
Forward born in 1983
#305
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sebastian Speck
Endicott · 2024-25
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Chuck Costello
Westfield State · 2016-17
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Culhane
Neumann · 2023-24
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.