IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Schremp Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-10-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Syracuse Jr. Crunch OJHL 43 14 28 42 0.977 0.2729 0.2874 0.6740 0.7097
2001-02 Syracuse Jr. Crunch OJHL 47 11 31 42 0.894 0.2497 0.2500 0.6167 0.6175
2002-03 — OJHL 34 9 17 26 0.765 0.2137 0.2051 0.5277 0.5066
2003-04 Syracuse Jr. Crunch OJHL 28 22 21 43 1.536 0.4291 0.3926 1.0598 0.9697
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 Elmira D3 — FR 11 5 4 9 0.818
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.82
2004-05 · Elmira
+200.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9158
Forward overall
#353
Forward born in 1983
#355
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gerald Mayhew
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trever Hertz
Utica · 2009-10
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Malcolm Arseneau
Fredonia · 2018-19
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Geiger
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.