IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ross Trousdale Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-12-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 40 8 11 19 0.475 0.1882 0.1897 0.4987 0.5027
2008-09 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 45 8 18 26 0.578 0.2289 0.2194 0.6066 0.5814
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SR 22 6 6 12 0.545
2011-12 St. Olaf D3 MIAC JR 27 10 11 21 0.778
2010-11 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SO 18 3 3 6 0.333
2009-10 St. Olaf D3 — FR 21 4 2 6 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2009-10 · St. Olaf
+60.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26364
Forward overall
#892
Forward born in 1988
#2190
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Nagel
Wisconsin-Stout · 2017-18
0.423 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyler Matthews
Canton · 2017-18
0.941 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Primo Self
Endicott · 2021-22
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.