IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Ceolin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-12-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Elite 37 35 17 52 1.405 0.1297 0.1245 0.3218 0.3089
2018-19 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 39 16 17 33 0.846 0.1107 0.1061 0.2872 0.2752
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC — 24 8 13 21 0.875
2021-22 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC — 17 7 9 16 0.941
2019-20 Fitchburg State D1 MASCAC FR 26 11 7 18 0.692
2019-20 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC — 26 11 7 18 0.692
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.69
2019-20 · Fitchburg State
+613.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19628
Forward overall
#931
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Evan Lugo
Post · 2016-17
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Fudger
SUNY Oswego · 2021-22
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tristan Morin
Curry · 2016-17
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.