IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Fudger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-12-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Vernon Vipers BCHL 48 2 12 14 0.292 0.1135 0.1135 0.4254 0.4254
2020-21 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 19 0 6 6 0.316 0.1229 0.1229 0.4605 0.4605
2021-22 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 45 17 15 32 0.711 0.2768 0.2632 1.0370 0.9862
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SR 27 2 6 8 0.296
2024-25 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 13 0 2 2 0.154
2023-24 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 13 1 0 1 0.077
2022-23 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 13 1 4 5 0.385
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2022-23 · SUNY Oswego
+70.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21405
Forward overall
#769
Forward born in 2001
#1926
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Ritt
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Denver
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zach Mazur
Endicott · 2018-19
1.222 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Trever Hertz
Utica · 2009-10
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Kolb
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2009-10
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.