IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Kolb Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-01-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Marquette Rangers NAHL 58 24 41 65 1.121 0.4117 0.4003 1.1829 1.1502
2010-11 Michigan Warriors NAHL 44 31 34 65 1.477 0.5428 0.5001 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen SR 31 9 10 19 0.613
2013-14 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 BigTen JR 7 1 3 4 0.571
2012-13 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 22 9 12 21 0.955
2011-12 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 16 6 8 14 0.875
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.39
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.88
2011-12 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+122.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5022
Forward overall
#238
Forward born in 1990

D1 Comparables

Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Shane Sooth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Payden Benning
Curry · 2007-08
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Bolden
Elmira · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Imala
Fitchburg State · 2022-23
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.