← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Imala Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-12-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 33 8 12 20 0.606 0.0761 0.0761 0.1913 0.1913
2021-22 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 47 33 40 73 1.553 0.1949 0.1961 0.4903 0.4933
2022-23 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 47 39 36 75 1.596 0.2003 0.1924 0.5038 0.4840
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 30 12 12 24 0.800
2024-25 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC 20 3 2 5 0.250
2024-25 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 30 12 12 24 0.800
2023-24 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC 26 10 9 19 0.731
2023-24 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 30 12 12 24 0.800
2022-23 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 30 12 12 24 0.800
2021-22 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 30 12 12 24 0.800
2020-21 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 30 12 12 24 0.800

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15043
Forward overall
#766
Forward born in 2002
#216
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2014-15
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2005-06
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.