← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin Maisells Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-12-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Chicago Cougars USPHL-Premier 27 5 5 10 0.370 0.0484 0.0491 0.1257 0.1276
2022-23 Chicago Cougars USPHL-Premier 34 14 27 41 1.206 0.1577 0.1523 0.4093 0.3954
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 8 2 2 4 0.500
2024-25 Arcadia D3 MAC 14 0 3 3 0.214
2024-25 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 8 2 2 4 0.500
2023-24 New England College D3 LittleEast 0 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 8 2 2 4 0.500
2022-23 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 8 2 2 4 0.500
2021-22 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 8 2 2 4 0.500
2020-21 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 8 2 2 4 0.500

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
8%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17609
Forward overall
#929
Forward born in 2002
#1103
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2006-07
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2012-13
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Framingham State · 2017-18
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.