IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Lugo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-11-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Connecticut Nighthawks EHL 39 7 19 26 0.667 0.0975 0.1003 0.3269 0.3362
2016-17 — EHL 45 8 15 23 0.511 0.0748 0.0735 0.2506 0.2464
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Post D2 NE10 — 26 8 6 14 0.538
2019-20 Post D1 — JR 26 6 16 22 0.846
2019-20 Post D2 NE10 GR 26 6 16 22 0.846
2018-19 Post D1 — SO 25 10 9 19 0.760
2018-19 Post D2 NE10 SR 25 10 9 19 0.760
2017-18 Post D2 NE10 JR 25 10 8 18 0.720
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.72
2017-18 · Post
+898.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27745
Forward overall
#1133
Forward born in 1996
#805
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Cessna
Fredonia · 2013-14
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Dockry
St. Thomas · 2012-13
0.579 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Graham Yeo
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2012-13
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.