IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tristan Morin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-11-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Hartford Jr. Wolfpack EHL 25 5 5 10 0.400 0.0858 0.0881 0.1959 0.2011
2016-17 Hartford Jr. Wolfpack EHL 14 4 5 9 0.643 0.1380 0.1354 0.3148 0.3089
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Curry D3 CNE SR 5 2 1 3 0.600
2019-20 Curry D3 CNE JR 26 4 6 10 0.385
2018-19 Curry D3 CNE SO 18 2 5 7 0.389
2017-18 Curry D3 CNE FR 21 1 8 9 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2017-18 · Curry
+329.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#34344
Forward overall
#1533
Forward born in 1996
#871
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Hayward
SUNY Brockport · 2008-09
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Garrett Grimstad
Wisconsin-Stout · 2008-09
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Zatorski
SUNY Potsdam · 2005-06
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.