IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aidan Canady Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-12-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Perth-Andover Bearcats USPHL-Premier 38 16 50 66 1.737 0.5724 0.5792 0.5909 0.5979
2023-24 — USPHL-Premier 43 6 34 40 0.930 0.3066 0.2954 0.3165 0.3049
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Post D2 NE10 — 29 5 15 20 0.690
2024-25 Post D2 NE10 — 27 2 15 17 0.630
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.39
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.63
2024-25 · Post
+63.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
2%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1630
Defenseman overall
#323
Defenseman born in 2003
#327
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Barrett Kaib
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Providence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Fleming
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Gazich
Gustavus Adolphus · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Donaldson
SUNY Potsdam · 2014-15
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jim Pollock
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.