IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Russell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-11-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 French River Rapids NOJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 French River Rapids NOJHL 44 8 16 24 0.545 0.0929 0.0965 0.2312 0.2401
2022-23 French River Rapids NOJHL 55 22 32 54 0.982 0.1672 0.1665 0.4161 0.4142
2023-24 — NOJHL 17 4 9 13 0.765 0.1302 0.1228 0.3241 0.3057
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 — 10 1 5 6 0.600
2024-25 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30620
Forward overall
#1785
Forward born in 2003
#376
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Hayward
SUNY Brockport · 2008-09
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Owen Van Tassel
Hamline · 2023-24
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Eoin Reager
Post · 2023-24
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.