IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eoin Reager Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-11-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Elite 39 25 31 56 1.436 0.1325 0.1344 0.3288 0.3336
2022-23 Atlanta Mad Hatters USPHL-Premier 44 8 21 29 0.659 0.0862 0.0870 0.2237 0.2259
2023-24 Atlanta Mad Hatters USPHL-Premier 42 7 31 38 0.905 0.1183 0.1137 0.3071 0.2952
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Post D2 NE10 — 24 8 6 14 0.583
2024-25 Post D2 NE10 — 21 1 6 7 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2024-25 · Post
+242.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4167
Defenseman overall
#1031
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jimmie Perkins
Bethel · 2010-11
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Clyne
Adrian · 2021-22
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Malcolm Cardwell
Framingham State · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.