IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jimmie Perkins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-11-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Albert Lea Thunder NAHL 54 3 9 12 0.222 0.0816 0.0860 0.2345 0.2470
2009-10 Albert Lea Thunder NAHL 14 1 4 5 0.357 0.1312 0.1329 0.3769 0.3819
2010-11 — NAHL 14 1 8 9 0.643 0.2362 0.2273 0.6786 0.6530
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Aurora D3 NCHA — 17 5 1 6 0.353
2012-13 Bethel D3 MIAC — 7 0 1 1 0.143
2011-12 Bethel D3 MIAC — 24 3 8 11 0.458
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2011-12 · Bethel
+182.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30962
Forward overall
#1133
Forward born in 1990
#2839
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tye Battipaglia
Fitchburg State · 2024-25
1.160 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Rhett Evjen
Stevenson · 2022-23
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dan Law
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.