icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Kindersley Klippers | SJHL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2010-11 | — | SJHL | 34 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 0.294 | 0.0850 | 0.0906 | 0.2214 | 0.2361 |
| 2011-12 | Flin Flon Bombers | SJHL | 57 | 21 | 30 | 51 | 0.895 | 0.2585 | 0.2616 | 0.6735 | 0.6817 |
| 2012-13 | Flin Flon Bombers | SJHL | 44 | 15 | 14 | 29 | 0.659 | 0.1904 | 0.1842 | 0.4962 | 0.4801 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Concordia | D3 | MIAC | — | 9 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.333 |
| 2014-15 | Concordia Wisconsin | D3 | — | SO | 9 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.333 |
| 2013-14 | Concordia | D3 | MIAC | — | 24 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 1.000 |
| 2013-14 | Concordia Wisconsin | D3 | — | FR | 24 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 1.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.