IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Braedan Moffatt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-12-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Kanata Stallions CCHL 12 2 2 4 0.333 0.0723 0.0788 0.2553 0.2783
2012-13 Kanata Stallions CCHL 59 14 19 33 0.559 0.1213 0.1268 0.4284 0.4480
2013-14 Kanata Stallions CCHL 55 20 30 50 0.909 0.1972 0.1964 0.6964 0.6936
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Castleton D3 LittleEast — 10 0 1 1 0.100
2014-15 Castleton D3 LittleEast — 26 4 7 11 0.423
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2014-15 · Castleton
+193.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26857
Forward overall
#1028
Forward born in 1994
#549
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kenny Gillespie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Blake Winiecki
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Will Baginski
King's · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Flanagan
Buffalo State · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Collins
Hamline · 2018-19
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.