IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Canon Pieper Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-12-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Chicago Steel USHL 50 5 7 12 0.240 0.1528 0.1577 0.7192 0.7420
2012-13 Indiana Ice USHL 64 6 12 18 0.281 0.1791 0.1753 0.8427 0.8246
2013-14 Coquitlam Express BCHL 57 33 33 66 1.158 0.4507 0.4311 1.6886 1.6150
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 20 0 3 3 0.150
2017-18 Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 33 4 8 12 0.364
2015-16 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC FR 12 0 1 1 0.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2014-15 · Quinnipiac
-70.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10720
Forward overall
#389
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Gerald Mayhew
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Chad McDonald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.48 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Anthony Marra
SUNY Geneseo · 2014-15
1.161 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Cole
Trinity · 2012-13
1.846 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Reed
Curry · 2009-10
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.