IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Cole Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-07-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 — USHL 22 2 4 6 0.273 0.1737 0.1670 0.8172 0.7856
2012-13 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 57 24 26 50 0.877 0.3257 0.3084 0.9288 0.8794
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Trinity D3 NESCAC SR 31 13 21 34 1.097
2015-16 Trinity D3 NESCAC JR 28 10 12 22 0.786
2014-15 Trinity D3 NESCAC SO 29 16 22 38 1.310
2013-14 Trinity D3 NESCAC FR 26 19 29 48 1.846
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.85
2013-14 · Trinity
+756.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13221
Forward overall
#575
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shane Remenda
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Boyd
St. Norbert · 2005-06
1.033 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy Willock
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2005-06
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.