← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cade DeStefani Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-06-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Northern Cyclones NCDC 2 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 NCDC 46 9 13 22 0.478 0.1950 0.2129 0.3845 0.4198
2019-20 Northeast Generals NAHL 12 1 1 2 0.167 0.0612 0.0612 0.1760 0.1760
2020-21 Janesville Jets NAHL 44 23 22 45 1.023 0.3757 0.3757 1.0795 1.0795
2021-22 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 33 3 9 12 0.364 0.2145 0.1950 1.0920 0.9927
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Salve Regina D3 CNE SR 25 14 18 32 1.280
2024-25 Salve Regina D3 CNE 24 7 10 17 0.708
2022-23 Lindenwood D1 CCHA 26 7 8 15 0.577
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2022-23 · Lindenwood
+233.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11909
Forward overall
#547
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2014-15
1.143 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2015-16
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.