IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Gareau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-11-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Kanata Stallions CCHL 55 5 6 11 0.200 0.0571 0.0649 0.1548 0.1760
2011-12 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 31 7 5 12 0.387 0.2465 0.2535 1.1600 1.1927
2012-13 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 47 10 6 16 0.340 0.2168 0.2114 1.0201 0.9946
2013-14 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 19 2 3 5 0.263 0.1676 0.1556 0.7887 0.7321
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Clarkson D1 ECAC SR 31 4 1 5 0.161
2016-17 Clarkson D1 ECAC JR 13 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Clarkson D1 ECAC SO 18 1 3 4 0.222
2014-15 Clarkson D1 ECAC FR 14 2 0 2 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2014-15 · Clarkson
-6.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18875
Forward overall
#717
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andy Corran
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2001-02
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Farley
Utica · 2006-07
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Caleb Serre
Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.