IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Paul Rodrigues Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-10-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Vaughan Vipers OJHL 47 21 22 43 0.915 0.2556 0.2749 0.6314 0.6791
2006-07 Vaughan Vipers OJHL 42 21 26 47 1.119 0.3126 0.3205 0.7722 0.7918
2007-08 Vaughan Vipers OJHL 49 37 61 98 2.000 0.5588 0.5477 1.3802 1.3528
2008-09 Newmarket Hurricanes OJHL 53 37 53 90 1.698 0.4744 0.4406 1.1719 1.0885
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 SUNY Oswego D3 — SR 30 16 30 46 1.533
2011-12 SUNY Oswego D3 — JR 28 14 23 37 1.321
2010-11 SUNY Oswego D3 — SO 26 13 12 25 0.962
2009-10 SUNY Oswego D3 — FR 28 7 18 25 0.893
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.41
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.89
2009-10 · SUNY Oswego
+115.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3494
Forward overall
#154
Forward born in 1988
#25
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Greg Harris
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2000-01
0.722 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nikita Kozyrev
Buffalo State · 2018-19
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jon Gaffney
Utica · 2008-09
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.