← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nikita Kozyrev Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-07-08 Country: Estonia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 49 10 12 22 0.449 0.1667 0.1741 0.4754 0.4964
2017-18 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 57 15 27 42 0.737 0.2736 0.2721 0.7801 0.7760
2018-19 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 51 20 25 45 0.882 0.3276 0.3112 0.9343 0.8875
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SR 26 14 19 33 1.269
2021-22 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC JR 21 5 11 16 0.762
2020-21 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC FR 26 9 23 32 1.231
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.23
2019-20 · Buffalo State
+386.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12447
Forward overall
#428
Forward born in 1998
#728
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2005-06
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2005-06
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.