← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Leone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-11-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Texarkana Bandits NAHL 47 5 7 12 0.255 0.0948 0.0998 0.2703 0.2845
2006-07 St. Louis Bandits NAHL 58 14 24 38 0.655 0.2433 0.2441 0.6937 0.6960
2007-08 St. Louis Bandits NAHL 55 16 47 63 1.145 0.4253 0.4058 1.2129 1.1573
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Western Michigan D1 SR 35 6 11 17 0.486
2011-12 Western Michigan D1 JR 22 2 6 8 0.364
2010-11 Western Michigan D1 SO 24 6 8 14 0.583
2008-09 Utica D3 FR 13 5 14 19 1.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.46
2008-09 · Utica
+400.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11027
Forward overall
#471
Forward born in 1987
#547
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2007-08
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2008-09
1.333 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.