| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-06 | Texarkana Bandits | NAHL | 47 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 0.255 | 0.0948 | 0.0998 | 0.2703 | 0.2845 |
| 2006-07 | St. Louis Bandits | NAHL | 58 | 14 | 24 | 38 | 0.655 | 0.2433 | 0.2441 | 0.6937 | 0.6960 |
| 2007-08 | St. Louis Bandits | NAHL | 55 | 16 | 47 | 63 | 1.145 | 0.4253 | 0.4058 | 1.2129 | 1.1573 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | Western Michigan | D1 | — | SR | 35 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 0.486 |
| 2011-12 | Western Michigan | D1 | — | JR | 22 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 0.364 |
| 2010-11 | Western Michigan | D1 | — | SO | 24 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 0.583 |
| 2008-09 | Utica | D3 | — | FR | 13 | 5 | 14 | 19 | 1.462 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.