IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Leone Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-11-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Texarkana Bandits NAHL 47 5 7 12 0.255 0.0938 0.0987 0.2695 0.2836
2006-07 St. Louis Bandits NAHL 58 14 24 38 0.655 0.2407 0.2415 0.6916 0.6939
2007-08 St. Louis Bandits NAHL 55 16 47 63 1.145 0.4209 0.4016 1.2091 1.1537
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Western Michigan D1 CCHA-orig SR 35 6 11 17 0.486
2011-12 Western Michigan D1 CCHA-orig JR 22 2 7 9 0.409
2010-11 Western Michigan D1 CCHA-orig SO 24 6 8 14 0.583
2008-09 Utica D3 UCHC FR 13 5 14 19 1.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.46
2008-09 · Utica
+405.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14599
Forward overall
#505
Forward born in 1987
#658
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Gerald Mayhew
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Payden Benning
Curry · 2007-08
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Imala
Fitchburg State · 2022-23
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Bolden
Elmira · 2015-16
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.