IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Sheehan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-08-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 South Shore Kings USPHL-Elite 42 28 21 49 1.167 0.1077 0.1074 0.2672 0.2666
2015-16 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier-Classic 5 0 2 2 0.400 0.1123 0.1088 0.3289 0.3186
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Framingham State D3 MASCAC SR 15 2 1 3 0.200
2018-19 Framingham State D3 MASCAC JR 25 6 6 12 0.480
2017-18 Framingham State D3 MASCAC SO 25 6 5 11 0.440
2016-17 Framingham State D3 MASCAC FR 25 7 3 10 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2016-17 · Framingham State
+331.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24091
Forward overall
#918
Forward born in 1995
#53
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hunter Laslo
SUNY Brockport · 2015-16
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Chad Bazin
Utica · 2007-08
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Stephen Beck
Western New England · 2014-15
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.