← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Laslo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-08-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EHL 39 11 16 27 0.692 0.1599 0.1689 0.3387 0.3577
2014-15 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EHL 40 19 23 42 1.050 0.2426 0.2449 0.5138 0.5186
2015-16 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EHL 41 20 23 43 1.049 0.2423 0.2339 0.5132 0.4955
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Brockport D1 SR 26 4 3 7 0.269
2019-20 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SR 26 4 3 7 0.269
2018-19 Brockport D1 JR 26 3 9 12 0.462
2018-19 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC JR 26 3 9 12 0.462
2017-18 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC SO 23 4 2 6 0.261
2016-17 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC FR 23 4 3 7 0.304
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2016-17 · SUNY Brockport
+49.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13004
Forward overall
#522
Forward born in 1995
#170
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2014-15
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2024-25
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Rivier · 2023-24
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.