← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stephen Beck Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-07-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Philadelphia Jr. Flyers EHL 43 4 3 7 0.163 0.0349 0.0350 0.0797 0.0798
2014-15 Philadelphia Jr. Flyers EHL 44 21 17 38 0.864 0.1853 0.1769 0.4229 0.4038
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Western New England D3 CNE SR 25 8 11 19 0.760
2017-18 Western New England D3 CNE JR 26 16 15 31 1.192
2016-17 Western New England D3 CNE SO 23 7 5 12 0.522
2015-16 Western New England D3 CNE FR 19 5 2 7 0.368
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2015-16 · Western New England
+258.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#32820
Forward overall
#1360
Forward born in 1994
#776
in EHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2006-07
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2017-18
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.