IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stephen Beck Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-07-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Philadelphia Jr. Flyers EHL 43 4 3 7 0.163 0.0376 0.0377 0.0797 0.0798
2014-15 Philadelphia Jr. Flyers EHL 44 21 17 38 0.864 0.1995 0.1905 0.4226 0.4035
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Western New England D3 CNE SR 25 8 11 19 0.760
2017-18 Western New England D3 CNE JR 26 16 15 31 1.192
2016-17 Western New England D3 CNE SO 23 7 5 12 0.522
2015-16 Western New England D3 CNE FR 19 5 2 7 0.368
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2015-16 · Western New England
+232.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28306
Forward overall
#1091
Forward born in 1994
#812
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bobby Hineman
Adrian · 2006-07
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnathon Mead
Lake Forest · 2023-24
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Williams
SUNY Oswego · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.