← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bobby Hineman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1986-07-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Port Hope Predators OJHL 43 2 8 10 0.233 0.0570 0.0625 0.1601 0.1754
2003-04 Port Hope Predators OJHL 47 4 12 16 0.340 0.0834 0.0876 0.2344 0.2463
2004-05 Port Hope Predators OJHL 45 2 10 12 0.267 0.0654 0.0654 0.1836 0.1836
2005-06 Port Hope Predators OJHL 48 8 27 35 0.729 0.1787 0.1722 0.5021 0.4838
2006-07 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 38 7 17 24 0.632 0.2434 0.2268 0.9192 0.8564
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 30 0 14 14 0.467
2009-10 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 25 2 11 13 0.520
2008-09 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 24 5 12 17 0.708
2007-08 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 28 5 15 20 0.714
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2007-08 · Adrian
+269.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6002
Defenseman overall
#875
Defenseman born in 1986

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Post · 2017-18
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2022-23
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trine · 2018-19
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.