← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bobby Hineman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1986-07-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Port Hope Predators OJHL 43 2 8 10 0.233 0.0650 0.0712 0.1605 0.1759
2003-04 Port Hope Predators OJHL 47 4 12 16 0.340 0.0951 0.0999 0.2349 0.2468
2004-05 Port Hope Predators OJHL 45 2 10 12 0.267 0.0745 0.0745 0.1840 0.1840
2005-06 Port Hope Predators OJHL 48 8 27 35 0.729 0.2037 0.1963 0.5032 0.4848
2006-07 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 38 7 17 24 0.632 0.2458 0.2290 0.9211 0.8581
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 30 0 14 14 0.467
2009-10 Adrian D3 JR 25 2 11 13 0.520
2008-09 Adrian D3 SO 24 5 12 17 0.708
2007-08 Adrian D3 FR 28 5 15 20 0.714
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2007-08 · Adrian
+250.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3411
Defenseman overall
#720
Defenseman born in 1986

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trine · 2018-19
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.