← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Prappas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-05-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Wichita Falls Wildcats NAHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 50 17 13 30 0.600 0.2446 0.2436 0.4823 0.4804
2018-19 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 50 23 23 46 0.920 0.3751 0.3522 0.7395 0.6943
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Trine D3 NCHA SR 28 10 18 28 1.000
2021-22 Trine D3 NCHA JR 24 10 17 27 1.125
2020-21 Trine D1 NCHA SO 13 5 9 14 1.077
2020-21 Trine D3 NCHA SO 13 5 9 14 1.077
2019-20 Trine D1 NCHA FR 28 10 16 26 0.929
2019-20 Trine D3 NCHA FR 28 10 16 26 0.929
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.93
2019-20 · Trine
+251.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6226
Forward overall
#287
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Morrisville · 2006-07
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2008-09
0.632 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2024-25
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.