IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Turner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1985-09-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 Williams Lake TimberWolves BCHL 23 1 5 6 0.261 0.1015 0.1009 0.3805 0.3782
2005-06 Williams Lake TimberWolves BCHL 56 7 18 25 0.446 0.1737 0.1639 0.6510 0.6144
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 New England College D3 — SR 27 4 10 14 0.518
2008-09 New England College D3 — JR 27 4 14 18 0.667
2007-08 New England College D3 — SO 27 0 23 23 0.852
2006-07 New England College D3 — FR 28 4 16 20 0.714
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2006-07 · New England College
+445.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7572
Defenseman overall
#1031
Defenseman born in 1985
#2472
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Dylan Zink
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jesse Horacek
SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bret Adams
Curry · 2002-03
1.759 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
David McNab
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2004-05
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.