← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin Leonard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1982-01-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Brooks Bandits AJHL 63 16 43 59 0.936 0.3141 0.3193 0.8666 0.8810
2001-02 Brooks Bandits AJHL 19 2 13 15 0.789 0.2648 0.2611 0.7306 0.7204
2002-03 Canmore Eagles AJHL 15 7 4 11 0.733 0.2459 0.2309 0.6786 0.6373
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 Western New England D3 CNE SR 24 18 17 35 1.458
2003-04 Western New England D3 CNE JR 25 14 18 32 1.280
2002-03 Western New England D3 CNE SO 22 11 15 26 1.182
2001-02 Western New England D3 CNE FR 17 4 6 10 0.588
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2001-02 · Western New England
+115.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19814
Forward overall
#596
Forward born in 1982
#449
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Thomas · 2010-11
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Arcadia · 2022-23
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.