IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kevin Leonard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1982-01-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Brooks Bandits AJHL 63 16 43 59 0.936 0.3128 0.3134 0.8694 0.8710
2001-02 — AJHL 59 14 38 52 0.881 0.2944 0.2806 0.8182 0.7799
2002-03 — AJHL 57 21 34 55 0.965 0.3223 0.2921 0.8957 0.8119
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2004-05 Western New England D3 — SR 24 18 17 35 1.458
2003-04 Western New England D3 — JR 25 14 18 32 1.280
2002-03 Western New England D3 — SO 22 11 15 26 1.182
2001-02 Western New England D3 — FR 17 4 6 10 0.588
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2001-02 · Western New England
+119.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9685
Forward overall
#369
Forward born in 1982
#301
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Bullard
Canton · 2015-16
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Kielich
SUNY Brockport · 2014-15
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mason Baptista
St. Norbert · 2010-11
0.464 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.