| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000-01 | Brooks Bandits | AJHL | 63 | 16 | 43 | 59 | 0.936 | 0.3141 | 0.3193 | 0.8666 | 0.8810 |
| 2001-02 | Brooks Bandits | AJHL | 19 | 2 | 13 | 15 | 0.789 | 0.2648 | 0.2611 | 0.7306 | 0.7204 |
| 2002-03 | Canmore Eagles | AJHL | 15 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 0.733 | 0.2459 | 0.2309 | 0.6786 | 0.6373 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | Western New England | D3 | CNE | SR | 24 | 18 | 17 | 35 | 1.458 |
| 2003-04 | Western New England | D3 | CNE | JR | 25 | 14 | 18 | 32 | 1.280 |
| 2002-03 | Western New England | D3 | CNE | SO | 22 | 11 | 15 | 26 | 1.182 |
| 2001-02 | Western New England | D3 | CNE | FR | 17 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 0.588 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.