IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Altenbernd Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-09-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 58 20 21 41 0.707 0.2625 0.2638 0.7485 0.7523
2010-11 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 57 26 33 59 1.035 0.3843 0.3667 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 St. Thomas D3 — SR 26 13 13 26 1.000
2013-14 St. Thomas D3 — JR 28 11 14 25 0.893
2012-13 St. Thomas D3 — SO 26 8 8 16 0.615
2011-12 St. Thomas D3 — FR 26 6 10 16 0.615
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2011-12 · St. Thomas
+120.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8302
Forward overall
#346
Forward born in 1990

D1 Comparables

C.J. Reuschlein
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Zach Szajner
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max McHugh
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Artem Buzoberya
Hobart · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Caleb Anderson
Gustavus Adolphus · 2016-17
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Shawn Hulshof
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.