IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Altenbernd Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-09-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 58 20 21 41 0.707 0.2597 0.2610 0.7461 0.7499
2010-11 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 57 26 33 59 1.035 0.3803 0.3628 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 St. Thomas D3 CCHA SR 26 13 13 26 1.000
2013-14 St. Thomas D3 CCHA JR 28 11 14 25 0.893
2012-13 St. Thomas D3 CCHA SO 26 8 8 16 0.615
2011-12 St. Thomas D3 CCHA FR 26 6 10 16 0.615
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2011-12 · St. Thomas
+123.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11330
Forward overall
#462
Forward born in 1990

D1 Comparables

Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jared VanWormer
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Artem Buzoberya
Hobart · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Caleb Anderson
Gustavus Adolphus · 2016-17
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendon Manning
Saint Anselm · 2022-23
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.