IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caleb Anderson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-10-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 9 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2016-17 Alexandria Blizzard NA3HL 46 21 41 62 1.348 0.1624 0.1624 0.4258 0.4259
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 4 1 2 3 0.750
2019-20 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 25 16 18 34 1.360
2018-19 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 25 4 12 16 0.640
2017-18 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 27 5 10 15 0.556
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2017-18 · Gustavus Adolphus
+280.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25819
Forward overall
#1115
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Erik Baskin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Air Force (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Conor Lemirande
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Miami (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Szajner
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mitch Fritz
Saint John's · 2013-14
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Klin
Buffalo State · 2007-08
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Zilka
Hamline · 2005-06
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.