IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Klin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-10-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 48 12 10 22 0.458 0.1123 0.1151 0.3155 0.3234
2007-08 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 49 16 19 35 0.714 0.1751 0.1716 0.4918 0.4819
2008-09 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 42 14 19 33 0.786 0.1926 0.1788 0.5410 0.5023
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SR 25 0 6 6 0.240
2011-12 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC JR 26 13 12 25 0.962
2010-11 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC SO 26 8 9 17 0.654
2009-10 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC FR 25 3 12 15 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2009-10 · Buffalo State
+298.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27374
Forward overall
#930
Forward born in 1988
#1333
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shane Prifrel
Worcester State · 2021-22
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Buchanan
Hamline · 2007-08
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Collins
Elmira · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.