← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shane Prifrel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Simley USHS-MN 26 18 16 34 1.308 0.3520 0.3520 0.3176 0.3176
2020-21 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 28 4 9 13 0.464 0.0559 0.0559 0.1467 0.1467
2021-22 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 22 2 3 5 0.227 0.0641 0.0616 0.1840 0.1768
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Worcester State D3 MASCAC SR 25 6 13 19 0.760
2024-25 Worcester State D3 MASCAC JR 26 10 4 14 0.538
2023-24 Worcester State D3 MASCAC SO 25 7 9 16 0.640
2022-23 Worcester State D3 MASCAC FR 27 9 8 17 0.630
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.63
2022-23 · Worcester State
+313.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#42791
Forward overall
#1974
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2015-16
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2018-19
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2006-07
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.