← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shane Prifrel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Simley USHS-MN 26 18 16 34 1.308 0.1656 0.1656 0.3176 0.3176
2020-21 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 28 4 9 13 0.464 0.0583 0.0583 0.1466 0.1466
2021-22 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 22 2 3 5 0.227 0.0927 0.0891 0.1827 0.1755
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Worcester State D3 MASCAC SR 25 6 13 19 0.760
2024-25 Worcester State D3 MASCAC JR 26 10 4 14 0.538
2023-24 Worcester State D3 MASCAC SO 25 7 9 16 0.640
2022-23 Worcester State D3 MASCAC FR 27 9 8 17 0.630
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.63
2022-23 · Worcester State
+514.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30199
Forward overall
#1595
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Morrisville · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2012-13
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2006-07
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.