IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mitch Fritz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-10-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 43 5 12 17 0.395 0.1320 0.1310 0.3670 0.3643
2014-15 Bonnyville Pontiacs AJHL 54 16 27 43 0.796 0.2660 0.2500 0.7392 0.6946
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Saint John's D3 — JR 24 6 7 13 0.542
2016-17 Saint John's D3 — SO 14 4 4 8 0.571
2015-16 Saint John's D3 — FR 14 6 9 15 1.071
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.07
2015-16 · Saint John's
+518.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18848
Forward overall
#767
Forward born in 1994
#946
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Bestwick
SUNY Geneseo · 2002-03
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Maxwell Reavis
UMass Boston · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Zilka
Hamline · 2006-07
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.