IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex LoGuercio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-12-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Andover NE-Prep 27 4 3 7 0.259 0.0731 0.0731 0.1187 0.1187
2022-23 Frederick Gunn NE-Prep 36 27 14 41 1.139 0.3213 0.3213 0.5212 0.5212
2023-24 Frederick Gunn NE-Prep 33 24 15 39 1.182 0.3334 0.3334 0.5408 0.5408
2024-25 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NAHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC — 6 2 0 2 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2025-26 · Skidmore
+15.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
45%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6831
Forward overall
#237
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Salvaggio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tony Calderone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dakota Dubetz
Marian · 2006-07
1.333 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jonathan Grebosky
Concordia · 2011-12
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Tretowicz
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2016-17
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.