icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-12 | Janesville Jets | NAHL | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2012-13 | Indiana Ice | USHL | 28 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 0.464 | 0.2957 | 0.3028 | 1.3914 | 1.4249 |
| 2013-14 | Indiana Ice | USHL | 36 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 0.306 | 0.1946 | 0.1902 | 0.9158 | 0.8951 |
| 2014-15 | Madison Capitols | USHL | 55 | 13 | 21 | 34 | 0.618 | 0.3937 | 0.3654 | 1.8526 | 1.7196 |
| 2021-22 | TPS | Liiga | 51 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 0.412 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Lake Superior State | D1 | WCHA | SO | 36 | 11 | 23 | 34 | 0.944 |
| 2015-16 | Lake Superior State | D1 | WCHA | FR | 40 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 0.500 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.