Mitch Hults Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-11-13 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2011-12	Janesville Jets	NAHL	4	0	0	0	0.000	—	—	—	—
2012-13	Indiana Ice	USHL	28	5	8	13	0.464	0.2739	0.2805	1.3945	1.4281
2013-14	Indiana Ice	USHL	36	5	6	11	0.306	0.1803	0.1762	0.9178	0.8970
2014-15	Madison Capitols	USHL	55	13	21	34	0.618	0.3647	0.3385	1.8567	1.7234
2021-22	TPS	Liiga	51	9	12	21	0.412	1.0295	0.9451	3.5399	3.2499

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2016-17	Lake Superior State	D1	WCHA	SO	36	11	23	34	0.944
2015-16	Lake Superior State	D1	WCHA	FR	40	9	11	20	0.500

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.23

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

0.50

2015-16 · Lake Superior State

+113.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

92%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3661

Forward overall

#196

Forward born in 1994

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm

Neumann · 2003-04

1.800 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Arkhip Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Brandon Osmundson

Utica · 2018-19

1.448 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.