IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Aston-Reese Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-08-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 — USHL 27 2 3 5 0.185 0.1179 0.1310 0.5550 0.6166
2011-12 — USHL 53 5 10 15 0.283 0.1802 0.1918 0.8481 0.9026
2012-13 — USHL 60 9 21 30 0.500 0.3184 0.3219 1.4984 1.5150
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SR 38 31 32 63 1.658
2015-16 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast JR 41 14 29 43 1.049
2014-15 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast SO 31 13 10 23 0.742
2013-14 Northeastern D1 HockeyEast FR 35 8 11 19 0.543
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.54
2013-14 · Northeastern
+135.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16797
Forward overall
#685
Forward born in 1994
#2466
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Greenberg
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Miami (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Grant Besse
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jarrid Privitera
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Vermont (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Shuart
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.27 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nolan Redler
UMass Boston · 2014-15
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Bickley
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Dougherty
Western New England · 2018-19
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.