IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nolan Redler Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 21 4 4 8 0.381 0.1087 0.1112 0.2949 0.3016
2015-16 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 20 4 3 7 0.350 0.1362 0.1334 0.5104 0.4999
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast SR 19 17 10 27 1.421
2018-19 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast JR 28 15 19 34 1.214
2017-18 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast SO 27 24 15 39 1.444
2016-17 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast FR 24 10 17 27 1.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.12
2016-17 · UMass Boston
+955.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18180
Forward overall
#748
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Robin Höglund
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Mike Robinson
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ New Hampshire
0.11 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

William Palmer
Stonehill · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ian DeLong
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2007-08
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Owen Sikich
Saint Mary's · 2016-17
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.