IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ian DeLong Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-06-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Oswego Admirals OJHL 49 17 17 34 0.694 0.1939 0.1957 0.4789 0.4833
2007-08 — OJHL 23 7 11 18 0.783 0.2187 0.2108 0.5401 0.5206
2008-09 — OJHL 46 40 36 76 1.652 0.4616 0.4213 1.1402 1.0406
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Curry D3 CNE — 26 14 16 30 1.154
2011-12 Curry D3 CNE — 27 13 18 31 1.148
2010-11 Curry D3 — — 19 3 11 14 0.737
2010-11 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SO 3 1 1 2 0.667
2009-10 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 25 7 9 16 0.640
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2009-10 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+121.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8926
Forward overall
#412
Forward born in 1988
#331
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Adams
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ Holy Cross
0.44 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Morgan
New England · 2017-18
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitchell McPherson
Hamline · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Cousineau
Adrian · 2009-10
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.