IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Greenberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-07-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Texas Tornado NAHL 39 10 18 28 0.718 0.2666 0.2928 0.7601 0.8347
2012-13 Texas Tornado NAHL 60 25 32 57 0.950 0.3527 0.3696 1.0059 1.0541
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Miami D1 NCHC SR 27 2 3 5 0.185
2015-16 Miami D1 NCHC JR 32 1 9 10 0.312
2014-15 Miami D1 NCHC SO 35 1 5 6 0.171
2013-14 Miami D1 NCHC FR 33 2 6 8 0.242
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2013-14 · Miami
-16.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9329
Forward overall
#382
Forward born in 1994
#352
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Grant Besse
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aston-Reese
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jarrid Privitera
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Vermont (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Montgomery
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha
0.36 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Pat Egan
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2012-13
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Parker Mismash
St. Scholastica · 2014-15
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Braccini
Bethel · 2019-20
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.