IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Pat Egan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-09-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 54 28 24 52 0.963 0.2360 0.2432 0.6630 0.6831
2013-14 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 51 31 47 78 1.529 0.3749 0.3671 1.0530 1.0312
2014-15 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 59 9 25 34 0.576 0.2117 0.2013 0.6083 0.5783
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SR 27 8 7 15 0.556
2017-18 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC JR 10 4 4 8 0.800
2016-17 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SO 26 5 7 12 0.462
2015-16 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC FR 25 11 16 27 1.080
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.08
2015-16 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+371.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14587
Forward overall
#597
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mario Bianchi
Concordia · 2014-15
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Ranalli
Adrian · 2010-11
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Parker Wood
Endicott · 2014-15
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.