IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Pat Egan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-09-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 54 28 24 52 0.963 0.2691 0.2773 0.6646 0.6848
2013-14 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 51 31 47 78 1.529 0.4273 0.4184 1.0554 1.0335
2014-15 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 59 9 25 34 0.576 0.2140 0.2034 0.6102 0.5801
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SR 27 8 7 15 0.556
2017-18 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — JR 10 4 4 8 0.800
2016-17 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SO 26 5 7 12 0.462
2015-16 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 25 11 16 27 1.080
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.08
2015-16 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+336.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10890
Forward overall
#438
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mario Bianchi
Concordia · 2014-15
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilson Northey
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Ranalli
Adrian · 2010-11
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.