IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mario Bianchi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-09-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 42 10 9 19 0.452 0.1680 0.1685 0.4790 0.4804
2014-15 Janesville Jets NAHL 10 0 2 2 0.200 0.0743 0.0706 0.2118 0.2013
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 26 14 19 33 1.269
2017-18 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 19 7 15 22 1.158
2016-17 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 27 8 13 21 0.778
2015-16 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 26 11 4 15 0.577
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2015-16 · Concordia
+513.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#35133
Forward overall
#1453
Forward born in 1994
#4422
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Dau
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Victor Bergström
Plymouth State · 2015-16
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Phillip Middleton
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2015-16
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Nickels
Johnson & Wales · 2011-12
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.