IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ondrej Zehnal Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-08-22 Country: Czechia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 31 1 2 3 0.097 0.0571 0.0635 0.2907 0.3234
2011-12 Luleå HF U20 SHL-J20 10 1 0 1 0.100 0.0556 0.0593 0.1332 0.1420
2012-13 Luleå HF U20 SHL-J20 37 3 9 12 0.324 0.1802 0.1830 0.4321 0.4388
2013-14 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 50 3 11 14 0.280 0.1029 0.1030 0.2955 0.2959
2014-15 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 54 6 21 27 0.500 0.1837 0.1743 0.5278 0.5008
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Marian D3 NCHA — 4 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#33669
Forward overall
#1304
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jared Salminen
Rivier · 2023-24
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Timpano
SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Hogg
Concordia · 2014-15
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.