IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Timpano Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-09-03 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Brock Univ. · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Couchiching Terriers OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2009-10 Couchiching Terriers OJHL 54 8 11 19 0.352 0.0863 0.0924 0.2423 0.2595
2011-12 Milton Menace OJHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1226 0.1202 0.3443 0.3375
2012-13 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 50 16 34 50 1.000 0.2451 0.2280 0.6885 0.6405
2015-16 Brock Univ. USports-M 23 6 8 14 0.609 0.3212 0.3161 1.7841 1.7560
2016-17 Brock Univ. USports-M 26 7 13 20 0.769 0.4058 0.3795 2.2545 2.1083
2017-18 Brock Univ. USports-M 27 4 13 17 0.630 0.3322 0.2956 1.8454 1.6419
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 13 1 5 6 0.462
2013-14 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 12 2 4 6 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2013-14 · SUNY Oswego
+215.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11081
Forward overall
#454
Forward born in 1992

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2016-17
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shaquille Merasty
Adrian · 2015-16
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Rozak
SUNY Oswego · 2000-01
1.100 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.