IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Timpano Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-09-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Couchiching Terriers OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2009-10 Couchiching Terriers OJHL 54 8 11 19 0.352 0.0983 0.1053 0.2428 0.2600
2011-12 Milton Menace OJHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1397 0.1369 0.3451 0.3382
2012-13 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 50 16 34 50 1.000 0.2794 0.2599 0.6901 0.6420
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 SUNY Oswego D3 — SO 13 1 5 6 0.462
2013-14 SUNY Oswego D3 — FR 12 2 4 6 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2013-14 · SUNY Oswego
+177.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19575
Forward overall
#851
Forward born in 1992
#1444
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Beau Walker
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.40 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cole Stallard
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Christopher Wallace
Bowdoin · 2014-15
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Collin Kerchoff
Concordia Wisconsin · 2021-22
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.