← New Search ↗ Social Card

Victor Bergström Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-09-07 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Rögle BK U20 SHL-J20 20 1 6 7 0.350 0.1944 0.2075 0.4659 0.4974
2013-14 Rögle BK U20 SHL-J20 39 4 11 15 0.385 0.2136 0.2177 0.5120 0.5218
2014-15 Fargo Force USHL 42 0 7 7 0.167 0.0983 0.0953 0.5002 0.4847
2015-16 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 21 2 7 9 0.429 0.1575 0.1507 0.4530 0.4334
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Plymouth State D1 LittleEast SR 19 2 8 10 0.526
2019-20 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SR 19 2 8 10 0.526
2018-19 Plymouth State D1 LittleEast JR 18 9 12 21 1.167
2018-19 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast JR 18 9 12 21 1.167
2017-18 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast SO 21 8 15 23 1.095
2016-17 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast FR 17 2 6 8 0.471
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2016-17 · Plymouth State
+288.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10056
Defenseman overall
#1450
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2016-17
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Western New England · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2018-19
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.