IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Parker Wood Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-10-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Wellington Dukes OJHL 53 12 18 30 0.566 0.1581 0.1636 0.3906 0.4041
2013-14 Wellington Dukes OJHL 48 6 9 15 0.312 0.0873 0.0859 0.2157 0.2121
2014-15 Rio Grande Valley Killer Bees NAHL 56 18 19 37 0.661 0.2453 0.2342 0.6995 0.6680
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Salem State D3 MASCAC — 26 5 7 12 0.462
2017-18 Salem State D3 MASCAC — 27 4 11 15 0.556
2016-17 Endicott D3 — SO 3 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 UMass Boston D3 HockeyEast SO 11 0 1 1 0.091
2015-16 Endicott D3 CNE FR 24 12 9 21 0.875
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.88
2015-16 · Endicott
+484.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23617
Forward overall
#951
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cory Mozak
Wisconsin-Stout · 2004-05
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Zac Boyle
Neumann · 2016-17
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Steve Culbertson
Castleton · 2005-06
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.