IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Parker Mismash Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-05-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Edina High USHS-MN 23 17 22 39 1.696 0.4565 0.4156 0.4119 0.3750
2015-16 — NAHL 43 2 9 11 0.256 0.0950 0.0942 0.2708 0.2686
2016-17 — NAHL 48 16 26 42 0.875 0.3249 0.3046 0.9264 0.8686
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 St. Scholastica D3 — SR 13 1 6 7 0.538
2019-20 St. Scholastica D3 — JR 4 1 1 2 0.500
2018-19 St. Scholastica D3 — SO 16 1 6 7 0.438
2017-18 St. Scholastica D3 — FR 26 6 10 16 0.615
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.62
2017-18 · St. Scholastica
+226.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11863
Forward overall
#460
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike McPherson
Plymouth State · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Remenda
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2002-03
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joey Martini
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
1.192 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.