IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Osterberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-09-05 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Eisbären Regensburg · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 53 7 13 20 0.377 0.2805 0.2934 1.4082 1.4731
2011-12 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 60 6 21 27 0.450 0.3345 0.3327 1.6791 1.6703
2012-13 Omaha Lancers USHL 46 9 15 24 0.522 0.3078 0.3123 1.5669 1.5899
2018-19 Karlskrona HK Allsvenskan 30 3 8 11 0.367 0.9168 0.9504 3.4403 3.5664
2022-23 Eisbären Regensburg DEL2 23 11 7 18 0.783 1.0484 0.9670 1.4043 1.2953
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC SR 42 12 11 23 0.548
2015-16 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC JR 32 4 6 10 0.312
2014-15 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC SO 40 7 11 18 0.450
2013-14 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC FR 35 14 13 27 0.771
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.77
2013-14 · Minnesota Duluth
+181.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5394
Forward overall
#269
Forward born in 1994

D2/3 Comparables

Ben Blasko
Nazareth · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Rihards Marenis
Aurora · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bloom
University of New England · 2017-18
1.654 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.