Ben Blasko Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-03-25 Country: Canada

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2011-12	Brockville Braves	CCHL	56	22	51	73	1.304	0.2828	0.2696	1.0086	0.9617
2012-13	Brockville Braves	CCHL	62	33	67	100	1.613	0.3498	0.3181	1.2479	1.1347
2015-16	Ontario Tech Univ.	USports-M	28	7	18	25	0.893	0.4711	0.4532	2.6171	2.5179
2016-17	Ontario Tech Univ.	USports-M	22	6	15	21	0.955	0.5036	0.4598	2.7976	2.5542
2017-18	Ontario Tech Univ.	USports-M	28	10	25	35	1.250	0.6595	0.5721	3.6638	3.1785

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2014-15	Nazareth	D3	UCHC	—	27	6	25	31	1.148
2013-14	Nazareth	D3	UCHC	—	26	11	15	26	1.000

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.26

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

1.00

2013-14 · Nazareth

+291.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 37 comparables)

11%

NCAA D1

NCAA D2/D3

89%

Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4172

Forward overall

#219

Forward born in 1992

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Osmundson

Utica · 2018-19

1.448 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Neil Trimm

Neumann · 2003-04

1.800 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

Filimon Ledenkov

St. Scholastica · 2018-19

1.636 Elite

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.