IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Blasko Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-03-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Brockville Braves CCHL 56 22 51 73 1.304 0.2828 0.2696 1.0091 0.9622
2012-13 Brockville Braves CCHL 62 33 67 100 1.613 0.3498 0.3181 1.2485 1.1353
2015-16 Ontario Tech Univ. usports 28 7 18 25 0.893 — — — —
2016-17 Ontario Tech Univ. usports 22 6 15 21 0.955 — — — —
2017-18 Ontario Tech Univ. usports 28 10 25 35 1.250 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Nazareth D3 UCHC — 27 6 25 31 1.148
2013-14 Nazareth D3 UCHC — 26 11 15 26 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2013-14 · Nazareth
+291.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6119
Forward overall
#296
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Carlson
Wilkes · 2021-22
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
David Italiano
Williams · 2013-14
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Depp
Elmira · 2011-12
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.